From owner-ports-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Wed May 14 22:23:22 2008
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) id m4EDNMv11017;
	Wed, 14 May 2008 22:23:22 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-ports-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [195.103.189.109] ([195.103.189.109])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id m4EDNJ910991
	for <ports-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 May 2008 22:23:20 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from dehumidifyst2642@saraleebreads.com)
Received: from [195.103.189.109] by mx1.biz.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 14 May 2008 14:23:20 +0100
Message-ID: <01c8b5ce$0f05fc00$6dbd67c3@dehumidifyst2642>
From: "Rachelle Lane" <dehumidifyst2642@saraleebreads.com>
To: <ports-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="windows-1250";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.1830
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
Reply-To: ports-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 14:23:20 +0100
X-Sequence: ports-jp 41112
Subject: [ports-jp 41112] What kind of increase can I expect?
Sender: owner-ports-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: dehumidifyst2642@saraleebreads.com
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+060209

Moreover, VPXL is the only remedy...
http://

