{
  "schema_version": "1.6.1",
  "id": "RPI-CVE-2026-74568",
  "modified": "2026-10-07T14:35:31Z",
  "upstream": [
    "CVE-2026-74568"
  ],
  "published": "2026-08-15T12:28:42Z",
  "summary": "KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration",
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration\n\nFix a potential race between decrementing an LPI's reference count and\nevicting that structure from the LPI xarray.\n\nLPI structures are maintained in the VGIC LPI xarray (dist->lpi_xa).\nWhen the reference count of an LPI structure drops to zero,\nvgic_release_lpi_locked() removes the structure from the xarray and\nfrees it under the xarray lock.\n\nHowever, the release of an LPI can race with a concurrent LPI\nre-registration with the same INTID via vgic_add_lpi() on another CPU,\nsince the reference count drop and the xarray eviction are not performed\nin a single atomic step. This can happen e.g. if the guest issues a\nDISCARD while the LPI is still referenced from a vCPU's active-pending\nlist (ap_list), and the same INTID is re-mapped via MAPTI.\n\nParticularly, vgic_release_lpi_locked() is called from two distinct\npaths: direct release via vgic_put_irq(), and deferred release via\nvgic_release_deleted_lpis(). During direct release, the issue can result\nin deleting a newly registered LPI from the xarray:\n\n  CPU0 (Releasing LPI)                    CPU1 (Adding new LPI)\n  ====================                    =====================\n  vgic_put_irq()\n      __vgic_put_irq()\n          refcount_dec_and_test()\n                                          vgic_add_lpi()\n                                              xa_lock_irqsave()\n                                              old_irq = xa_load(.., intid)\n                                              vgic_try_get_irq_ref(old_irq) == false\n                        new IRQ inserted -->  __xa_store(.., intid, ..)\n                                              xa_unlock_irqrestore()\n  xa_lock_irqsave();\n  vgic_release_lpi_locked()\n      __xa_erase(.., irq->intid)   <-- BUG: new IRQ is erased\n      kfree_rcu(old_irq)\n\nDuring the deferred release path, the old IRQ can be leaked:\n\n  CPU0 (Releasing LPI)                    CPU1 (Adding new LPI)\n  ====================                    =====================\n  vgic_put_irq_norelease()\n      __vgic_put_irq()\n          refcount_dec_and_test()\n      irq->pending_release = true\n                                          vgic_add_lpi()\n                                              xa_lock_irqsave()\n                                              old_irq = xa_load(.., intid)\n                                              vgic_try_get_irq_ref(oldirq) == false\n                 BUG: old IRQ overwritten --> __xa_store(.., intid, ..)\n                                              xa_unlock_irqrestore()\n\n  vgic_release_deleted_lpis()\n      xa_lock_irqsave()\n      xa_for_each() { .. } <-- old IRQ with pending_release = true\n                               is gone, so it cannot be released\n\nTo fix the direct release path, move the reference count drop inside\nthe xarray lock, making sure that vgic_add_lpi() never encounters the\nto-be-released LPI.\n\nIn the deferred release path, the refcount drop must happen under a raw\nspinlock, so the xarray lock cannot be grabbed, and the same solution\ndoes not work. Instead, update vgic_add_lpi(), so that if it evicts\nan LPI from the xarray, it takes on the responsibility of freeing it.\nConsequently, an LPI may now be freed concurrently after a deferred\nrelease drops the refcount, so accessing the pending_release field is no\nlonger safe from use-after-free. Delete all uses of the flag, and update\nvgic_release_deleted_lpis() to identify orphaned LPIs purely based on\ntheir refcount.",
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Raspberry Pi OS:13",
        "name": "linux"
      },
      "versions": [
        "1:6.18.29-1+rpt1",
        "1:6.18.33-1+rpt1",
        "1:6.18.34-1+rpt1",
        "1:6.18.39-1+rpt1",
        "1:6.18.50-1+rpt1"
      ],
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "binaries": [
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.29+rpt-rpi-2712",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.29-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.29+rpt-rpi-v8",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.29-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.29+rpt-rpi-v8-rt",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.29-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.33+rpt-rpi-2712",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.33-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.33+rpt-rpi-v8",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.33-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.33+rpt-rpi-v8-rt",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.33-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.34+rpt-rpi-2712",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.34-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.34+rpt-rpi-v8",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.34-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.34+rpt-rpi-v8-rt",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.34-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.39+rpt-rpi-2712",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.39-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.39+rpt-rpi-v8",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.39-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.39+rpt-rpi-v8-rt",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.39-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.50+rpt-rpi-2712",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.50-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.50+rpt-rpi-v8",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.50-1+rpt1"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "linux-image-6.18.50+rpt-rpi-v8-rt",
            "binary_version": "1:6.18.50-1+rpt1"
          }
        ]
      },
      "database_specific": {
        "per_version": {
          "1:6.18.29-1+rpt1": {
            "linux_commit": "66318c5b5cd8145a662303af12ed39ac07eb27cc",
            "upstream_version": "6.18.29",
            "assessment": "commit ancestry (strak rule)",
            "upstream_fixed": null
          },
          "1:6.18.33-1+rpt1": {
            "linux_commit": "95b85bebbedcaedfa7ca79116ed38b7376fba412",
            "upstream_version": "6.18.33",
            "assessment": "commit ancestry (strak rule)",
            "upstream_fixed": null
          },
          "1:6.18.34-1+rpt1": {
            "linux_commit": "c8c7494100e99ee05b11aaa4f0588a223a63d1af",
            "upstream_version": "6.18.34",
            "assessment": "commit ancestry (strak rule)",
            "upstream_fixed": null
          },
          "1:6.18.39-1+rpt1": {
            "linux_commit": "60ea684a8ace97bb0db1a16e20753bdd6ab371ff",
            "upstream_version": "6.18.39",
            "assessment": "commit ancestry (strak rule)",
            "upstream_fixed": null
          },
          "1:6.18.50-1+rpt1": {
            "linux_commit": "cff533aec2fa601846766b32ff57204e0a61bed7",
            "upstream_version": "6.18.50",
            "assessment": "commit ancestry (strak rule)",
            "upstream_fixed": null
          }
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74568"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/292e80a159aa88635bf668a7212cfdf526b8bd52"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbfe2b24a1ea9de35032dbdd100fdc700f5be92d"
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "source": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git",
    "upstream_modified": "2026-08-17T05:50:24Z"
  }
}
